| 
| Subject: | The example didn't validate? | 
|---|
 | Summary: | Package rating comment | 
|---|
 | Messages: | 3 | 
|---|
 | Author: | Andrew John | 
|---|
 | Date: | 2007-11-27 14:40:15 | 
|---|
 | Update: | 2007-11-27 18:43:07 | 
|---|
 |  |  |  | 
Andrew John rated this package as follows:
| Utility: | Not sure | 
|---|
| Consistency: | Not sure | 
|---|
| Documentation: | Not sure | 
|---|
| Examples: | Not sure | 
|---|
|  | 
  Andrew John - 2007-11-27 14:40:16The example didn't validate?
  Vagharshak Tozalakyan - 2007-11-27 18:00:08 - In reply to message 1 from Andrew JohnWhat validator you are using? As far as I remember I've checked the sample at http://feedvalidator.org/ and it was ok there. I know, W3C validator is more strict now, I'll check it these days. Thank you for letting me know.
  Vagharshak Tozalakyan - 2007-11-27 18:43:07 - In reply to message 2 from Vagharshak TozalakyanI slightly modified the code, now it should pass W3C validation. Could you check? |